Contact Us Today! (972) 712-1515

"The Blog"

Private Decanting: A Do-Over Trust With Your Privacy Intact

Posted by Darryl V. Pratt | May 19, 2020 | 0 Comments

Private Decanting: A Do-Over Trust With Your Privacy Intact

decanting (2)

What is Trust Decanting?

For many years, practitioners have struggled to find ways to change the terms of an irrevocable trust. However, through common law and through the decanting statutes that have been enacted in many jurisdictions, it is now possible to modify an irrevocable trust. The rationale for allowing such a modification is that a trustee who has the power to distribute the trust property to or for the benefit of one or more beneficiaries should be able to make the distribution to them in trust and dictate the terms of that trust. Decanting is essentially a “do-over”.

Trust decanting is the act of distributing assets from one trust to a new trust with different terms. Just as one can decant wine by pouring it from its original bottle into a new bottle, leaving the unwanted sediment in the original bottle, one can pour the assets from one trust into a new trust, leaving the unwanted terms in the original trust.

Most [but not all] Jurisdictions Require Notice to the Beneficiaries

There are 29 jurisdictions with decanting statutes at the time of this writing. Of the 29 decanting jurisdictions, 22 of them require notice to be given to the trust beneficiaries before a decanting can be done.

Arizona, Delaware, New Hampshire (notice required only for charitable trusts), Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wyoming are the only decanting jurisdictions that do not require notice to be sent to beneficiaries.

Our Clients want Privacy

People value their privacy. We go out of our way to maintain the attorney/client relationship in order to shield our clients' private matters not only from outsiders, but also from their own family members. As spectacular as the idea of decanting may sound to a client, the moment you inform them that all of the beneficiaries must receive a copy of the trust, the room seems to get very quiet and the excitement wears off very quickly.

Following is an example of a decanting notice statute from one of the 22 states that requires notice:

“(g) To effect the exercise of the power to appoint principal or income under subsection (a) of this section, all of the following apply:

(1) The exercise of the power to appoint must be made by an instrument in writing, signed and acknowledged by the trustee, setting forth the manner of the exercise of the power, including the terms of the second trust, and the effective date of the exercise of the power. The instrument must be filed with the records of the original trust.

(2) The trustee shall give written notice to all qualified beneficiaries of the original trust, at least ninety days prior to the effective date of the exercise of the power to appoint, of the trustee's intention to exercise the power. The notice must include a copy of the instrument described in item (1) of this subsection.

(3) If all qualified beneficiaries waive the notice period by a signed written instrument delivered to the trustee, the trustee's power to appoint principal or income is exercisable after notice is waived by all qualified beneficiaries, notwithstanding the effective date of the exercise of the power.”

Avoiding the Notice Problem

Assume that the trust isn't sitused under the laws of Arizona, Delaware, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee or Wyoming where there is no notice requirement. Does this mean that there are no options and your client is simply going to choose not to decant the trust simply because of privacy concerns?

Take a look at the trust agreement to see if there is a change of situs provision. Very often, the trust agreement will allow the trustee or a trust protector to change the situs simply by adding a co-trustee in that jurisdiction. Thus, by thinking two moves ahead, notice can be avoided. First, change the situs to the non-notice jurisdiction. Then decant the trust. Therefore, the client's privacy is maintained through this private decanting.


Decanting is a wonderful tool and arguably the most important planning concept of the 21st century. But too many of our clients become frustrated by the notice requirements that the large majority of the decanting jurisdictions require. This article highlights the seven jurisdictions - Arizona, Delaware, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee and Wyoming - that do not require notice for a decanting. For those in estate planning who thought that decanting had to be a family affair, this article opens up a new strategy called a private decanting.


You have invested a lot of time in making your business a success, and it is difficult to think about relinquishing ownership or control of it. Nevertheless, planning is critical in creating a lasting legacy for your family. We can help you put a plan in place that helps you successfully pass your business on to the next generation and ensures that you have a financially secure retirement. Contact our office today at (972) 712-1515 to set up a meeting to discuss this timely topic.

About the Author

Darryl V. Pratt

With almost twenty-five (25) of experience as a dual-licensed Attorney and Certified Public Accountant, Darryl V. Pratt has practiced law in all areas of corporate and business law, non-profit law, estate planning, probate, guardianship, asset protection planning, bankruptcy (Chapters 7, 13 and 11), real estate, and taxation.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

DISCLAIMER Pratt Law Group, PLLC (PLG) has prepared the material on this web site, for informational purposes only; it does not constitute legal advice. Further, the material on this site does not create, and receipt does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. The information here is not intended to substitute for obtaining legal advice from an attorney. No person should act or rely on any information in this site without seeking the advice of an attorney. Members of the law firm of PLG are licensed to practice in various courts and jurisdictions; attorneys are specifically licensed to practice in state courts that are enumerated on their individual attorney profiles. We also have affiliations in particular cases with attorneys licensed in additional states. PLG does not offer any guarantee of case results. Although we are extremely proud of our excellent track record, past success does not guarantee success in any new or future case or client matter. This web site is considered advertising by the State Bar of Texas under the applicable law and ethical rules. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Only those attorneys who state they are Board Certified in their profiles on this website are Board Certified. All other attorneys are not Board Certified. Darryl V. Pratt is the attorney responsible for this site. The principal office of PLG is 2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 505, Frisco, Texas 75034. Please note that the transmission of an e-mail inquiry itself does not create an attorney-client relationship. PLG cannot serve as your counsel in any matter unless you and our firm expressly agree in writing that we serve as your attorney. You should also be aware that the Statute of Limitations (the deadline imposed by law within which you may bring a lawsuit) may have expired or may severely limit the time remaining for you to file any potential claims you may have. Time is of the essence. If you believe you have a possible legal case, it is important that you seek out legal advice as soon as possible.